Cancer of the Bladder and UrinaryTract¶
Chapter 91 | Part 4: Oncology and Hematology · Part 4 – Oncology: Solid Tumors · Chapter 91
Key Clinical Points¶
- Painless hematuria is the primary presentation in 70-90% of cases; 90% of patients are current or former smokers.
- Urothelial carcinoma (transitional cell) is the dominant histology (~90%); other variants include squamous, glandular, micropapillary, and plasmacytoid.
- NMIBC management relies on TURBT followed by intravesical therapy (Mitomycin C or BCG based on risk).
- MIBC treatment typically involves neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by cystectomy.
- Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EV+P) is the preferred first-line therapy for metastatic disease.
- FGFR inhibitors (erdafitinib) are indicated specifically for patients with activating FGFR genomic alterations.
- Upper tract urothelial carcinoma requires nephroureterectomy, or segmental ureterectomy if renal function is impaired.
- 5-year survival rates vary significantly by stage: 96% for non-invasive, 39-50% for stage III, and 8% for metastatic disease.
- High-risk NMIBC includes T1 tumors, high-grade tumors, CIS, or large/multiple Ta tumors in patients >70 years old.
- Specific mutations: FGFR3 (low-grade), TP53/RB1 (high-grade), and Lynch syndrome (upper tract).
DEFINITION & CLASSIFICATION¶
• Overview: Second most common genitourinary malignancy; bladder cancer is the 6th most common cancer in the U.S.
Histology¶
• Urothelial carcinoma (transitional cell): ~90% of cases. • Variant histologies (10-20%): squamous, glandular, micropapillary, and plasmacytoid; these correlate with worse outcomes. • Non-urothelial variants (<10%): squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and small-cell carcinoma.
EPIDEMIOLOGY¶
• Demographics: Median age at diagnosis is 73 years; males are 4x more likely than females to develop the disease. • Geographic/Ethnic factors: Higher incidence in Caucasians.
Risk Factors¶
• Tobacco use: Primary risk factor (90% of cases in U.S.) due to 70+ carcinogens. • Chemical/Environmental exposure: Arsenic, aromatic amines, and industrial chemicals. • Other factors: Chronic schistosomiasis or indwelling catheters (increase squamous cancer risk); Pioglitazone use may slightly increase risk.
ETIOLOGY & PATHOPHYSIOLOGY¶
• Phenotypic distinction: ◦ Low-grade: Recurrent, non-invasive; associated with FGFR3 mutations. ◦ High-grade: Invasive, metastatic; associated with TP53/RB1 mutations. • Lynch syndrome: Associated with microsatellite instability (MSI); accounts for 10-20% of upper tract urothelial carcinomas.
Molecular Biology¶
• Genomic landscape: 71% of patients have targetable alterations (FGFR3, EGFR, ERBB2). • TCGA Subtypes: luminal papillary, luminal infiltrated, basal squamous, neuronal, and luminal. • Chromatin modification: Mutations in these genes are present in most cases.
CLINICAL FEATURES¶
• Primary Presentation: Painless hematuria (70-90% of cases). • Secondary Symptoms: Flank pain → may indicate upper tract disease or hydronephrosis from bladder obstruction. • Advanced Disease: Cachexia and metastases are rarely present at initial diagnosis.
Diagnostic Workup¶
• Urine cytology: 50% sensitivity for high-grade tumors. • Imaging/Endoscopy: CT urogram, cystoscopy (with blue light/narrow-band imaging to detect flat lesions), and ureteroscopy for suspected upper tract tumors.
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS¶
• Common Mimics: Urinary tract infection, menstrual bleeding (females), and benign causes (trauma, stones). • Clinical Rule: Persistent hematuria after antibiotic treatment requires further evaluation.
Molecular Diagnostics¶
• Utility: FISH and bladder tumor antigen may detect recurrence but have limited utility in initial diagnosis.
DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH¶
- Initial Screening: Urine cytology, CT urogram, and cystoscopy.
- Enhanced Detection: Use of blue light/narrow-band imaging (NBI) to identify flat lesions.
- Upper Tract Evaluation: Ureteroscopy for suspected upper tract tumors.
- Confirmatory Step: Histologic confirmation via TURBT or endoscopic resection.
- Metastatic Workup: Genomic sequencing is recommended for metastatic patients.
MANAGEMENT & TREATMENT¶
- Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC): a. Risk Stratification (Table 91-1): • Low risk: Initial, solitary, low grade, <3 cm, no CIS. • High risk: T1; high-grade; CIS; or multiple and large (>3 cm) Ta low-grade tumors in patients over age 70 (all conditions must be met for the latter). b. Treatment: TURBT followed by intravesical therapy (Mitomycin C or BCG). c. BCG Efficacy: Reduces recurrence by 50-29% and progression by 27%; maintenance BCG improves outcomes.
- Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC): a. Standard Care: Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy → Cystectomy. b. Bladder-sparing chemoradiation: For patients with no CIS, no hydronephrosis, and maximal TURBT; 65% cure rate, 55% bladder intact. c. Adjuvant Therapy: Cisplatin-based chemotherapy for high-risk postcystectomy (pT3-4, N+); Nivolumab for high-risk MIBC/UTUC (30% improvement in DFS).
- Metastatic Disease: a. First-line: Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EV+P) preferred over platinum-based chemotherapy. b. Targeted Therapy: Erdafitinib for patients with activating FGFR mutations.
- Urinary Diversion (Post-Cystectomy): a. Options: Ileostomy, continent reservoir (Indiana pouch), or neobladder.
Upper Tract Management¶
- Primary Choice: Nephroureterectomy.
- Renal Preservation: Segmental ureterectomy for patients with significant renal impairment.
- CIS Treatment: BCG via nephrostomy tube to preserve kidney function.
COMPLICATIONS & PROGNOSIS¶
• Survival by Stage (Table 91-2): ◦ Tis/Ta: 96% 5-year survival. ◦ T1: 90% 5-year survival. ◦ T2: 70% 5-year survival. ◦ T3: 50% 5-year survival. ◦ T1-T4 with N1-N3: 36% 5-year survival. ◦ Any M1: 5% 5-year survival. • Clinical Definitions:
Definition (Harrison's 22e): Stage I–II bladder cancer has a 70-90% 5-year survival rate; stage III, 39-50%; stage IV, 8%. • Recurrence: Low risk (<10%), High risk (>70%). • Complications: UTI, metabolic disturbances (hyperphosphatemia with FGFR inhibitors), and immune-related toxicities (pneumonitis, colitis).
SPECIAL POPULATIONS¶
• Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 1. Neoadjuvant cisplatin improves pathologic complete response (14%). 2. Adjuvant chemotherapy reduces recurrence by 55% after nephroureterectomy.
KEY PEARLS & HIGH-YIELD POINTS¶
• Urgent Workup: Painless hematuria in males requires immediate investigation. • BCG Contraindications: Do not use in patients with prior BCG infection or immunosuppression. • Metastatic Preference: EV+P is the preferred first-line over platinum-based chemotherapy. • FGFR Monitoring: Patients on erdafitinib require ophthalmologic monitoring for central serous retinopathy. • Ureterectomy Rule: Segmental ureterectomy should be reserved for patients with significant renal impairment.
Reference Tables¶
TABLE 90-3 Commonly Used Systemic Regimens for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma CLASS Antiangiogenic: TKIs¶
Harrison's 22e, p.690
| CLASS | DRUG | FIRST FDA APPROVAL FOR RCC |
CURRENTLY USED FOR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antiangiogenic: TKIs | Sunitinib | 2006 | Advanced RCC, first line |
| Pazopanib | 2009 | Advanced RCC, first line | |
| Axitinib | 2012 | Advanced RCC, pretreated | |
| Cabozantinib | 2016 2017 |
Advanced RCC, pretreated with antiangiogenic therapy Advanced RCC, first line |
|
| Tivozanib | 2021 | Advanced RCC, pretreated with two or more prior systemic therapies |
|
| Nivolumab | 2015 | ||
| Combination therapies | |||
| TKI + mTOR inhibitor | Lenvatinib + everolimus | 2016 | Advanced RCC, pretreated with one antiangiogenic therapy |
| PD-1 inhibitor + CTLA-4 inhibitor | Nivolumab + ipilimumab | 2018 | Advanced intermediate-risk or poor-risk RCC, first line |
| PD-1 inhibitor + TKI | Pembrolizumab + axitinib | 2019 | Advanced RCC, first line |
| Nivolumab + cabozantinib | 2021 | Advanced RCC, first line | |
| Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib | 2021 | Advanced RCC, first line | |
| 91 | Cancer of the Bladder and Urinary Tract Noah M. Hahn |
Table 91-2 are required to In carefully selected patients¶
Harrison's 22e, p.693
- Bladder cancer prognosis according to stage
- T N M Stage 5-yr survival
- Tis/Ta N0 M0 0is/0a 96%
- T1 N0 M0 1 90%
- T2 N0 M0 2 70%
- T3 N0 M0 3 50%
- T1-T4 N1-N3 M0 3 36%
- Any T Any N M1 4 5%
TABLE 91-1 Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Recurrence Risk Groups¶
Harrison's 22e, p.693
| RISK GROUP | CHARACTERISTICS |
|---|---|
| Low risk | Initial tumor, solitary tumor, low grade, <3 cm, no CIS |
| High risk | Any of the following: • T1 tumor • High-grade • CIS • Multiple and large (>3 cm) Ta low-grade tumors in patients over age 70 (all conditions must be met for this point on Ta low-grade tumors) |