Skip to content

Cancer of the Bladder and UrinaryTract

Chapter 91 | Part 4: Oncology and Hematology · Part 4 – Oncology: Solid Tumors · Chapter 91


Key Clinical Points

  1. Painless hematuria is the primary presentation in 70-90% of cases; 90% of patients are current or former smokers.
  2. Urothelial carcinoma (transitional cell) is the dominant histology (~90%); other variants include squamous, glandular, micropapillary, and plasmacytoid.
  3. NMIBC management relies on TURBT followed by intravesical therapy (Mitomycin C or BCG based on risk).
  4. MIBC treatment typically involves neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by cystectomy.
  5. Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EV+P) is the preferred first-line therapy for metastatic disease.
  6. FGFR inhibitors (erdafitinib) are indicated specifically for patients with activating FGFR genomic alterations.
  7. Upper tract urothelial carcinoma requires nephroureterectomy, or segmental ureterectomy if renal function is impaired.
  8. 5-year survival rates vary significantly by stage: 96% for non-invasive, 39-50% for stage III, and 8% for metastatic disease.
  9. High-risk NMIBC includes T1 tumors, high-grade tumors, CIS, or large/multiple Ta tumors in patients >70 years old.
  10. Specific mutations: FGFR3 (low-grade), TP53/RB1 (high-grade), and Lynch syndrome (upper tract).

DEFINITION & CLASSIFICATION

Overview: Second most common genitourinary malignancy; bladder cancer is the 6th most common cancer in the U.S.

Histology

Urothelial carcinoma (transitional cell): ~90% of cases. • Variant histologies (10-20%): squamous, glandular, micropapillary, and plasmacytoid; these correlate with worse outcomes. • Non-urothelial variants (<10%): squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and small-cell carcinoma.


EPIDEMIOLOGY

Demographics: Median age at diagnosis is 73 years; males are 4x more likely than females to develop the disease. • Geographic/Ethnic factors: Higher incidence in Caucasians.

Risk Factors

Tobacco use: Primary risk factor (90% of cases in U.S.) due to 70+ carcinogens. • Chemical/Environmental exposure: Arsenic, aromatic amines, and industrial chemicals. • Other factors: Chronic schistosomiasis or indwelling catheters (increase squamous cancer risk); Pioglitazone use may slightly increase risk.


ETIOLOGY & PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Phenotypic distinction: ◦ Low-grade: Recurrent, non-invasive; associated with FGFR3 mutations. ◦ High-grade: Invasive, metastatic; associated with TP53/RB1 mutations. • Lynch syndrome: Associated with microsatellite instability (MSI); accounts for 10-20% of upper tract urothelial carcinomas.

Molecular Biology

Genomic landscape: 71% of patients have targetable alterations (FGFR3, EGFR, ERBB2). • TCGA Subtypes: luminal papillary, luminal infiltrated, basal squamous, neuronal, and luminal. • Chromatin modification: Mutations in these genes are present in most cases.


CLINICAL FEATURES

Primary Presentation: Painless hematuria (70-90% of cases). • Secondary Symptoms: Flank pain → may indicate upper tract disease or hydronephrosis from bladder obstruction. • Advanced Disease: Cachexia and metastases are rarely present at initial diagnosis.

Diagnostic Workup

Urine cytology: 50% sensitivity for high-grade tumors. • Imaging/Endoscopy: CT urogram, cystoscopy (with blue light/narrow-band imaging to detect flat lesions), and ureteroscopy for suspected upper tract tumors.


DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

Common Mimics: Urinary tract infection, menstrual bleeding (females), and benign causes (trauma, stones). • Clinical Rule: Persistent hematuria after antibiotic treatment requires further evaluation.

Molecular Diagnostics

Utility: FISH and bladder tumor antigen may detect recurrence but have limited utility in initial diagnosis.


DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH

  1. Initial Screening: Urine cytology, CT urogram, and cystoscopy.
  2. Enhanced Detection: Use of blue light/narrow-band imaging (NBI) to identify flat lesions.
  3. Upper Tract Evaluation: Ureteroscopy for suspected upper tract tumors.
  4. Confirmatory Step: Histologic confirmation via TURBT or endoscopic resection.
  5. Metastatic Workup: Genomic sequencing is recommended for metastatic patients.

MANAGEMENT & TREATMENT

  1. Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC): a. Risk Stratification (Table 91-1): • Low risk: Initial, solitary, low grade, <3 cm, no CIS. • High risk: T1; high-grade; CIS; or multiple and large (>3 cm) Ta low-grade tumors in patients over age 70 (all conditions must be met for the latter). b. Treatment: TURBT followed by intravesical therapy (Mitomycin C or BCG). c. BCG Efficacy: Reduces recurrence by 50-29% and progression by 27%; maintenance BCG improves outcomes.
  2. Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC): a. Standard Care: Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy → Cystectomy. b. Bladder-sparing chemoradiation: For patients with no CIS, no hydronephrosis, and maximal TURBT; 65% cure rate, 55% bladder intact. c. Adjuvant Therapy: Cisplatin-based chemotherapy for high-risk postcystectomy (pT3-4, N+); Nivolumab for high-risk MIBC/UTUC (30% improvement in DFS).
  3. Metastatic Disease: a. First-line: Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EV+P) preferred over platinum-based chemotherapy. b. Targeted Therapy: Erdafitinib for patients with activating FGFR mutations.
  4. Urinary Diversion (Post-Cystectomy): a. Options: Ileostomy, continent reservoir (Indiana pouch), or neobladder.

Upper Tract Management

  1. Primary Choice: Nephroureterectomy.
  2. Renal Preservation: Segmental ureterectomy for patients with significant renal impairment.
  3. CIS Treatment: BCG via nephrostomy tube to preserve kidney function.

COMPLICATIONS & PROGNOSIS

Survival by Stage (Table 91-2): ◦ Tis/Ta: 96% 5-year survival. ◦ T1: 90% 5-year survival. ◦ T2: 70% 5-year survival. ◦ T3: 50% 5-year survival. ◦ T1-T4 with N1-N3: 36% 5-year survival. ◦ Any M1: 5% 5-year survival. • Clinical Definitions:

Definition (Harrison's 22e): Stage I–II bladder cancer has a 70-90% 5-year survival rate; stage III, 39-50%; stage IV, 8%.Recurrence: Low risk (<10%), High risk (>70%). • Complications: UTI, metabolic disturbances (hyperphosphatemia with FGFR inhibitors), and immune-related toxicities (pneumonitis, colitis).


SPECIAL POPULATIONS

Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 1. Neoadjuvant cisplatin improves pathologic complete response (14%). 2. Adjuvant chemotherapy reduces recurrence by 55% after nephroureterectomy.


KEY PEARLS & HIGH-YIELD POINTS

Urgent Workup: Painless hematuria in males requires immediate investigation. • BCG Contraindications: Do not use in patients with prior BCG infection or immunosuppression. • Metastatic Preference: EV+P is the preferred first-line over platinum-based chemotherapy. • FGFR Monitoring: Patients on erdafitinib require ophthalmologic monitoring for central serous retinopathy. • Ureterectomy Rule: Segmental ureterectomy should be reserved for patients with significant renal impairment.


Reference Tables

TABLE 90-3 Commonly Used Systemic Regimens for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma CLASS Antiangiogenic: TKIs

Harrison's 22e, p.690

CLASS DRUG FIRST FDA APPROVAL
FOR RCC
CURRENTLY USED FOR
Antiangiogenic: TKIs Sunitinib 2006 Advanced RCC, first line
Pazopanib 2009 Advanced RCC, first line
Axitinib 2012 Advanced RCC, pretreated
Cabozantinib 2016
2017
Advanced RCC, pretreated with antiangiogenic therapy
Advanced RCC, first line
Tivozanib 2021 Advanced RCC, pretreated with two or more prior
systemic therapies
Nivolumab 2015
Combination therapies
TKI + mTOR inhibitor Lenvatinib + everolimus 2016 Advanced RCC, pretreated with one antiangiogenic
therapy
PD-1 inhibitor + CTLA-4 inhibitor Nivolumab + ipilimumab 2018 Advanced intermediate-risk or poor-risk RCC, first line
PD-1 inhibitor + TKI Pembrolizumab + axitinib 2019 Advanced RCC, first line
Nivolumab + cabozantinib 2021 Advanced RCC, first line
Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib 2021 Advanced RCC, first line
91 Cancer of the Bladder
and Urinary Tract
Noah M. Hahn

Table 91-2 are required to In carefully selected patients

Harrison's 22e, p.693

  • Bladder cancer prognosis according to stage
  • T N M Stage 5-yr survival
  • Tis/Ta N0 M0 0is/0a 96%
  • T1 N0 M0 1 90%
  • T2 N0 M0 2 70%
  • T3 N0 M0 3 50%
  • T1-T4 N1-N3 M0 3 36%
  • Any T Any N M1 4 5%

TABLE 91-1 Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Recurrence Risk Groups

Harrison's 22e, p.693

RISK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS
Low risk Initial tumor, solitary tumor, low grade, <3 cm, no CIS
High risk Any of the following:
• T1 tumor
• High-grade
• CIS
• Multiple and large (>3 cm) Ta low-grade tumors in
patients over age 70 (all conditions must be met for this
point on Ta low-grade tumors)